WWE RAW 2/20/12 review: John Cena SHOOTS on The Rock, Wade Barrett injured

WWE RAW 2/20/12 review: John Cena shoots on The Rock, Undertaker vs. Triple H Hell in a Cell match, Wade Barrett breaks his arm, Chris Jericho is heading to Wrestlemania against CM Punk, and more! RECAP: Eve is planning to use John Cena. He catches her telling the Bella Twins about this, and goes to the ring to call her out on it. Eve starts crying and clinging to John Cena as he calls her a Hoeski. Sheamus defeated Mark Henry with a Brogue Kick John Laurinaitis and Theodore Long argue backstage about which one of them is the superior general manager. A number one contendership 10 man battle royal is annouced for later tonight, with the winner heading to Wrestlemania 28 to face CM Punk for the WWE Championship. Kofi Kingston and R-Truth defeated Epico and Primo with a Trouble in Paradise Ron Simmons is the newest inductee in the 2012 WWE Hall of Fame David Otunga defeated Ezekiel Jackson with a Spinebuster Undertaker confronts Triple H about their match at Wrestlemania. Triple H eventually challenges Undertaker to a Hell In A Cell match at Wrestlemania 28, which Undertaker seemed to accept. Daniel Bryan defeated Santino Marella via submission with a LeBell Lock The Bella Twins defeated Kelly Kelly and Aksana after switching places (twin magic) John Cena shoots on The Rock by calling him out on returning to the WWE and then leaving to go back to Hollywood. The Rock gets to respond on next week’s RAW. 10 man battle royal, winner faces CM Punk at Wrestlemania for the WWE
Video Rating: 3 / 5

22 comments to WWE RAW 2/20/12 review: John Cena SHOOTS on The Rock, Wade Barrett injured

  • menyamya itambu  says:

    u talk tooooooo much
    ?

  • florianfan2008  says:

    i would waiting eagerly to see? Undertaker getting booed lmfao.

  • gobSIDES  says:

    Speed in wrestling as a measure of enjoyment is opinion based. You can have no logic or fact based argument to disagree with this. I said why I THINK people may? be booing, I don’t pretend it is accurate nor have I stated these are my opinions or that I agree with the boos so please do not look to me for answers or justification for my speculations on others thoughts on undertaker coming back. If customers boo it is not enough to argue they shouldn’t.

  • florianfan2008  says:

    frustation for what? I dont see frustation coming into play. And no, slow isnt a matter of opinion, its a fact. They are slower than before, but certainly not slow. Unless that is u prefer mexican wrestling where guys fly around everywhere. They can still put on a? good show, and they proved it last year, which was taker’s last match. So out of what context are u doubting their ability to put on a good match again?
    Utilize the oldies for AS LONG as they are here.

  • gobSIDES  says:

    First off read my comments before you attemp to correct me. I never said they were my opinions-I said that they could be the possible cause for the frustration(which I later went on to say fans should bot be frustrated) Secondly slow or slower is a matter of opinion in this context-meaning neither you or the people who think they are slow are correct, but instead have an opinionated conflict. Also, new SS need to break through as? the (g)oldies wont be here for much longer.

  • florianfan2008  says:

    First of all, let me correct you. Taker and HHH arent slow, they are just slower than what they used to be. With all the age crap, they still got what it takes to put on a 5 star match. Last years HHH vs Taker was match of the year. Im tired of seeing untalented guys like Miz and Del Rio being pushed to the main event of Wrestlemania. I doubt any “younger”? superstar can put on a better match than a undertaker vs hhh match.

  • zebracrunk  says:

    I suppose they will open up YouTube on a gut instinct and search? for my videos?

  • MrSivi2001  says:

    I know why she’s crying: not because she’s a female but because she’s following the script.
    If? you continue to record these things I guess the girls will totally ignore you. 🙂

  • gobSIDES  says:

    LOL, maybe that was it then.?

  • GOLLY852  says:

    Now? that I think about it, when it happened on Raw, they were in a shitty town lol that has no respect

  • gobSIDES  says:

    Yeah exactly I can agree with that.
    I mean Taker and HHH may not have put in the hours like some other superstars, but they still have the ability to put on a great main event with the right set up.
    But regardless of the match itself and I am able to see why people are being disrespectful to Taker, but that doesn’t mean they are right to do it. Ater what Taker has done for WWE he deserves to finish his career by putting on? a great match and the fans should be patient.

  • Caleb Baumgartner  says:

    Being at the show last night, I was a bit annoyed by the “What?!” chants as well, but if memory serves me correctly, almost directly before the segment during break they played a promo for the new Steve Austin? DVD in the arena, and I think that directly inspired it. Not an excuse but more an explanation.

  • GOLLY852  says:

    I guess when I say they both deserve it, I suppose I am mostly talking about Undertaker. I agree with you that the last 4-5 manias have been lacking all around the show. WWE problem is that they always arrange the WM matches in a weird order Say like WM 24 Edge and Taker was a epic match but Flair and? Micheals should have went last. WM 25 should of been Taker and Shawn WM 26 was right WM 27 main event was horrible Should of been taker again and WM 28 is gonna be right, i went off topic

  • gobSIDES  says:

    Running low on words in last one, lol. Yeah there should not be frustration and Taker/HHH are WWE gold-but it is there, the fans are getting restless. The last like 4-5 WM’s have been beyond poor and a lot of the fans can see it-? I mean remember WM 22 Cena vs HHH-one of the worst headline matches ever and they are still declining and I think this decline in quality is really causing hardcore fans aswell to becom frustrated.

  • gobSIDES  says:

    I mean I see your point and it is also part of mine-because they are quite old(for WWE) they can only fight? every few months and it really lacks exitement for me, they are slow, they gas and get tiered and lay around for most of the match and it is boring compared to what they used to do and what some younger superstars can do.
    For clarity, I say young meaning guys who have been here for 5-6 years and still get snubbed.

  • GOLLY852  says:

    There shouldn’t be frustration, Taker and Hunter have been wrestling for over? 2 decades. They don’t need to show up to every house show. They been there in that position and both of them are too old to do that anymore. And when you say new guys getting ripped in the locker room because old dogs want more glory you cant expect a couple of new guys to pull off a match of that magnitude. This storyline has taken well over a decade to make and both men deserve that match even if it is 3rd.

  • zebracrunk  says:

    Nope, I still plan on it. The new season premiered yesterday in America, and Friday in Canada. I have no idea why? a Canadian show debuts four days late in its own country, but I’ll keep making Degrassi videos.

  • zebracrunk  says:

    No idea. I’m sure that will look pretty clumsy, however it’s able to be suspended? in the air.

  • zebracrunk  says:

    You would be in tears if your? antihero CM Punk got injured, keep on acting tough with zero videos of your own.

  • pieralnett  says:

    It’s unfortunate Wade Barret? got injured yesterday. When it happened I knew someone was ligitimately hurt, but i thought it was Ziggler.

  • MUNDOM316  says:

    WHAT??

  • pieralnett  says:

    That whole? first segment was just aweful yesterday. First of all like you said how could they not notice John? Second how could she think John wasn’t going to see it on TV? I mean I know it’s scripted but does the WWE even think of these things logically?

Leave a reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>